Unfortunately enabling Full NAT into the kernel didn't solve the problem. I don't know what else to do. Any ideas? Best regards, Paulo On Monday 17 February 2003 00:13, Khanh Tran wrote: > Well, Full NAT might take care of your "arguments" problem. I don't > know exactly what it affects, but it's NAT and that's what you are > trying to do. Plus, the instructions say so! What kernel are you > using? What OS/distribution? > > Khanh Tran > Network Operations > Sarah Lawrence College > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paulo J. Matos [mailto:pocm@mega.ist.utl.pt] > Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 6:55 PM > To: Khanh Tran; netfilter@lists.netfilter.org > Subject: Re: Command not working in latest version > > > You may not have all of the proper elements compiled into your > > kernel. > > Try: > > http://www.e-infomax.com/ipmasq/howto/c-html/ipmasq-compiling3.1.ht > >ml > > Hi Khanh, > > I've compiled the kernel specifically like they said in your > reference except those new options of 2.4.20 but still I get 'Invalid > Arguments' from iptables 1.2.7a. What's Full NAT in kernel config, is > that useful for iptables? > > I've run the line: > # iptables -v -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j SNAT --to > 217.129.146.56 SNAT all opt -- in * out eth1 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0.0.0.0/0 > to:217.129.146.56 iptables: Invalid Argument > > This is indeed strange. Do you have any idea of what could I do now? > > Is there any other iptables command line with the same outcome? > > Best regards, > > Paulo > > > Khanh Tran > > Network Operations > > Sarah Lawrence College > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Paulo J. Matos [mailto:pocm@mega.ist.utl.pt] > > Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 11:04 AM > > To: Khanh Tran; netfilter@lists.netfilter.org > > Subject: Re: Command not working in latest version > > > > > You should also make sure you are loading modules ip_tables and > > > > ip_conntrack > > > > > before you load your other modules. > > > > Iptables are built into the kernel, even after loading > > ipt_conntrack I receive invalid argument. > > > > I just do: > > iptables -t nat -F > > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j SNAT --to 217.129.146.56 > > > > First line is ok, second returns invalid argument. Getting > > desperate. Any ideas? > > > > Best regards, > > > > Paulo > > > > > Khanh Tran > > > Network Operations > > > Sarah Lawrence College > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Paulo J. Matos [mailto:pocm@mega.ist.utl.pt] > > > Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 9:45 AM > > > To: Khanh Tran; netfilter@lists.netfilter.org > > > Subject: Re: Command not working in latest version > > > > > > > You'll now want to do: > > > > > > > > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j SNAT --to $EXTIP > > > > > > > > where eth0 is the interface going out to the Internet and > > > > $EXTIP is > > the > > > > > public IP on that interface. > > > > > > Hi Khanh, strangely I still get Invalid Argument. > > > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j SNAT --to > > > 217.129.146.56 > > > > > > where eth1 is the interface that gives access to the internet > > > with IP 217.129.146.56 (given by DHCP server). > > > > > > Thx for your patience, > > > > > > Paulo > > > > > > > Khanh Tran > > > > Network Operations > > > > Sarah Lawrence College > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Paulo J. Matos [mailto:pocm@mega.ist.utl.pt] > > > > Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 9:00 AM > > > > To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org > > > > Subject: Command not working in latest version > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I've changed from my old distribution to a new one that comes > > > > with > > > > > > iptables > > > > > > > 1.2.7a. > > > > I have iptables in the kernel (2.4.20) and I've loaded the > > > > modules iptable_nat, ipt_REDIRECT and ipt_MASQUERADE. > > > > I had in my previous distributions the following lines: > > > > iptables -t nat -F > > > > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE > > > > > > > > This would give total access from lan attached to eth0 to the > > > > internet through my computer. But now, line 1 executes ok, line > > > > 2 gives: iptables: Invalid Argument > > > > > > > > If I do : > > > > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 > > > > everything runs ok but lan has still no access to the internet > > > > as > > > > > > expected. > > > > > > > What's happening, any ideas? > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > Paulo
