Hi Martin, I've lost your mail before reading it... Now I got it... I'll try to recompile the kernel with userspace iptables, thx. Best regards, Paulo On Monday 17 February 2003 07:30, Martin Josefsson wrote: > On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 00:54, Paulo J. Matos wrote: > > Hi Khanh, > > > > I've compiled the kernel specifically like they said in your > > reference except those new options of 2.4.20 but still I get > > 'Invalid Arguments' from iptables 1.2.7a. What's Full NAT in kernel > > config, is that useful for iptables? > > > > I've run the line: > > # iptables -v -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j SNAT --to > > 217.129.146.56 SNAT all opt -- in * out eth1 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0.0.0.0/0 > > to:217.129.146.56 iptables: Invalid Argument > > > > This is indeed strange. Do you have any idea of what could I do > > now? > > > > Is there any other iptables command line with the same outcome? > > I just have to put an end to this thread :) > > The solution is simple, recompile userspace iptables against your new > kernel. > A major NAT patch was included in 2.4.20 that breaks compability so > you have to recompile userspace iptables against the new > kernelheaders to get NAT working again (same for the owner match).
