----- Original Message ----- From: "Fabrice MARIE" <fabrice@netfilter.org> To: <netfilter@drbroyles.com>; <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org> Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 11:43 PM Subject: Re: Am I making a bone-headed mistake with patch-o-matic ? > There is a problem though (fixed in the CVS, but not yet updated on the HTML page..) > you shouldn't run # make patch-o-matic, but instead from the patch-o-matic directory, > you should run the ./runme script with the patch suite you want to apply as a parameter. > The corrected SGML source of the document is there : > http://cvs.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/~checkout~/netfilter/documentation/H OWTO/netfilter-extensions-HOWTO.sgml >From what I read in the above link, I think something may be wrong with my patch-o-matic I got via CVS. I ran a (./runme base) and I got the following output. In this output the only thing that is "Already applied:" is the first line. Nothing else seems to be applied after that. Plus, that link above references switches ( Do you want to apply this patch [N/y/t/f/q/?] ) that I am not getting. ********************************************************************* Each patch is a new feature: many have minimal impact, some do not. Almost every one has bugs, so I don't recommend applying them all! ------------------------------------------------------- Already applied: submitted/2.4.18 submitted/ahesp-static submitted/arptables submitted/config-cleanup submitted/conntrack?helper-unregister submitted/conntrack submitted/dscp submitted/DSCP submitted/ecn submitted/ECN submitted/helper submitted/ip6tables-export-symbols submitted/ip6tables-exthdr-bug-ipv6 submitted/ip_conntrack_protocol_destroy submitted/ip_conntrack_protocol_unregister submitted/ip_nat_irc-srcaddr-fix submitted/ipt_MIRROR-ttl submitted/ipt_REJECT-checkentry submitted/ipt_unclean-ecn submitted/ipv6-agr-ipv6 submitted/irc-dcc-mask submitted/length-ipv6 submitted/local-nat submitted/log-tunnel-fix-ipv6 submitted/macro-trailing-semicolon-fix submitted/mangle5hooks submitted/nat-export_symbols submitted/nat-memoryleak-fix submitted/netfilter-arp submitted/ownercmd submitted/pkttype submitted/REJECT-dont_fragment submitted/REJECT_mark submitted/remove_no_version submitted/skb_clone_copy submitted/TOS-oops-fix submitted/ulog-module-unload submitted/ulog-nlgroup-shift-fix submitted/ulog-sparc-bitops-fix submitted/unclean-udpchecksum submitted/z-newnat16 submitted/z-newnat_assertfix submitted/z-newnat_changeexpect-lockfix pending/newnat-udp-helper base/ahesp6-ipv6 base/frag6-ipv6 base/fuzzy base/iplimit base/ipt_unclean-ubit base/ipv4options base/IPV4OPTSSTRIP base/ipv6header-ipv6 base/mport base/NETLINK base/NETMAP base/nth base/opts6-ipv6 base/pool base/psd base/quota base/random base/realm base/REJECT-ipv6 base/route6-ipv6 base/SAME base/time base/TTL ----------------------------------------------------------------- No more patches to apply! Q to Quit or ? for options [Q/a/r/b/?] Excellent! Kernel is now ready for compilation. ********************************************************************* I never get a chance to choose which patches I wish to install. Before I wrote that first message to this mail list, I had already tried recompiling the kernel and iptables after I ran (./runme base). Does it look like my patch-o-matic is working incorrectly? Thanks, Brandon Broyles
