Add test that validates behavior of landlock after rule with
unhandled access is added.
Signed-off-by: Ivanov Mikhail <ivanov.mikhail1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c
index 5577b08d5..c1c2b5d30 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c
@@ -249,4 +249,37 @@ TEST_F(protocol, rule_with_unknown_access)
EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
}
+TEST_F(protocol, rule_with_unhandled_access)
+{
+ struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = {
+ .handled_access_socket = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_SOCKET_CREATE,
+ };
+ struct landlock_socket_attr protocol = {
+ .domain = self->srv0.protocol.domain,
+ .type = self->srv0.protocol.type,
+ };
+ int ruleset_fd;
+ __u64 access;
+
+ ruleset_fd =
+ landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0);
+ ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd);
+
+ for (access = 1; access > 0; access <<= 1) {
+ int err;
+
+ protocol.allowed_access = access;
+ err = landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_SOCKET,
+ &protocol, 0);
+ if (access == ruleset_attr.handled_access_socket) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, err);
+ } else {
+ EXPECT_EQ(-1, err);
+ EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
+ }
+ }
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
+}
+
TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
--
2.34.1
