[RFC PATCH v1 04/10] selftests/landlock: Create 'socket_access_rights' test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Add test that checks possibility of adding rule with every possible
access right.

Signed-off-by: Ivanov Mikhail <ivanov.mikhail1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 .../testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c  | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c
index 525f4f7df..7f31594bf 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c
@@ -194,4 +194,33 @@ TEST_F(protocol, create)
 	test_socket_create(_metadata, &self->srv0, true);
 }
 
+TEST_F(protocol, socket_access_rights)
+{
+	const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = {
+		.handled_access_socket = ACCESS_ALL,
+	};
+	struct landlock_socket_attr protocol = {
+		.domain = self->srv0.protocol.domain,
+		.type = self->srv0.protocol.type,
+	};
+	int ruleset_fd;
+	__u64 access;
+
+	ruleset_fd =
+		landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0);
+	ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd);
+
+	for (access = 1; access <= ACCESS_LAST; access <<= 1) {
+		protocol.allowed_access = access;
+		EXPECT_EQ(0,
+			  landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_SOCKET,
+					    &protocol, 0))
+		{
+			TH_LOG("Failed to add rule with access 0x%llx: %s",
+			       access, strerror(errno));
+		}
+	}
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
+}
+
 TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
-- 
2.34.1





[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux