Add test that validates behavior of landlock after rule with unknown access is added. Signed-off-by: Ivanov Mikhail <ivanov.mikhail1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@xxxxxxxxxx> --- .../testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c index 7f31594bf..5577b08d5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c @@ -223,4 +223,30 @@ TEST_F(protocol, socket_access_rights) EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); } +TEST_F(protocol, rule_with_unknown_access) +{ + const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = { + .handled_access_net = ACCESS_ALL, + }; + struct landlock_socket_attr protocol = { + .domain = self->srv0.protocol.domain, + .type = self->srv0.protocol.type, + }; + int ruleset_fd; + __u64 access; + + ruleset_fd = + landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0); + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd); + + for (access = 1ULL << 63; access != ACCESS_LAST; access >>= 1) { + protocol.allowed_access = access; + EXPECT_EQ(-1, + landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_SOCKET, + &protocol, 0)); + EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno); + } + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); +} + TEST_HARNESS_MAIN -- 2.34.1