On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 01:30:23AM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Yes, but its like this also before my patch, there are several
> > > test failures on s390 with nft master.
> >
> > Why is the listing being reordered?
>
> No idea, I only saw that this reordering happens, i did not have time to
> investigate so far.
>
> > > I will have a look, so far I only checked that my patch
> > > series does not cause any additional test failures, and the only
> > > reason why the new test fails is the output reorder on s390.
> >
> > This is also related to the set description patchset that Phil posted,
> > correct?
>
> No, I don't even know what patchset you are talking about.
> Is it because of failing pything tests because the debug output has
> endianess issues? If so, not related.
>
> > If you consider that adding remaining features is feasible,
> > incrementally should be fine.
>
> Hmm, if there is a technical reason as to why it does not work,
> do you think we should hold it back?
>
> It lookes like filter on "{ eth0, ppp* }" works fine as-is.
Then, good. Better than not working.
> I thought that something like "eth0-eth42" would also be doable,
> by treating both as 128bit bit-string.
>
> Don't see what prevents "ppp* . 80" from working from a technical pov.
>
> So, I *think* its fine to add the pure ifname set support now and
> add the rest incrementally.
OK, then move on.
Sorry, I read you cover letter and I thought there were pending
issues.
