Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Yes, but its like this also before my patch, there are several
> > test failures on s390 with nft master.
>
> Why is the listing being reordered?
No idea, I only saw that this reordering happens, i did not have time to
investigate so far.
> > I will have a look, so far I only checked that my patch
> > series does not cause any additional test failures, and the only
> > reason why the new test fails is the output reorder on s390.
>
> This is also related to the set description patchset that Phil posted,
> correct?
No, I don't even know what patchset you are talking about.
Is it because of failing pything tests because the debug output has
endianess issues? If so, not related.
> If you consider that adding remaining features is feasible,
> incrementally should be fine.
Hmm, if there is a technical reason as to why it does not work,
do you think we should hold it back?
It lookes like filter on "{ eth0, ppp* }" works fine as-is.
I thought that something like "eth0-eth42" would also be doable,
by treating both as 128bit bit-string.
Don't see what prevents "ppp* . 80" from working from a technical pov.
So, I *think* its fine to add the pure ifname set support now and
add the rest incrementally.
