Taehee Yoo <ap420073@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In order to destroy elements of set, a rhashtable_free_and_destroy() > is used. the rhashtable_free_and_destroy() cancels a re-hash deferred work > then walks and destroys elements. at this moment, some elements are > still in a future_tbl. that elements are not destroyed. Wait. Isn't that a bug in rhashtable_free_and_destroy()? I'd rather see rhashtable_free_and_destroy() do it correctly if possible rather than asking users of rhashtable_free_and_destroy() to not use that function... Or did i misunderstand and its a nft specific problem? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
