Taehee Yoo <ap420073@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > set->nelems is increased when set->size is given. > so that checking set->size routine should be added. Does it make sense to have sets with no upper size? I think it makes more sense to enforce an upper bound so that set->size is always nonzero. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
