2018-07-02 20:38 GMT+09:00 Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>: > Taehee Yoo <ap420073@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> set->nelems is increased when set->size is given. >> so that checking set->size routine should be added. > > Does it make sense to have sets with no upper size? > > I think it makes more sense to enforce an upper bound > so that set->size is always nonzero. Thank you for reviewing! I agree, In my opinion, default value that depend on set type should be given. How do you think? Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
