Re: CT: why no "none" as parameter for --ctevents?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Rolf,

On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 02:37:21PM +0200, Rolf Fokkens wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> It was brought up in the past, but I think it never was properly addressed.
> I'd like to have an iptables rule like this:
> 
>     iptables -w -t raw -I PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 10050 -j CT --ctevents
> none
> 
> The reasoning being this: There's no need to have (shorlived) Zabbix
> connections replicated using conntrackd.
> 
> I also posted a solution/hack for this:
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/netfilter-devel/msg42085.html
> 
> But there has not been any response to this.
> 
> So apart from my specific hack, could it be that my whish to have this
> supported in some way, is flawed?

That's fine.

Please, resend your patch in git-am format, including subject,
description and Signed-off-by: tag. Have a look at
git.netfilter.org/iptables/ for an example.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux