Am 9. Oktober 2015 12:12:05 WESZ, schrieb Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >On Thu, 8 Oct 2015, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >> > > Agreed, I think its a good idea to use 32 as for the other object >types. >> > >> > I'd suggest 128 or even 256 chars. In ipset the set name is limited >to 32 >> > too but I had received a few complains and plan to increase it. >> >> I guess we will follow suit then since we should be compatible to >ipset >> anyways. Did you already decide for a value? > >I thought 32 chars should be enough for everybody ;-) so I'm unsure >about >the good enough value. 128 seems just pretty long, but the name length >is >actually not critical, it could be 256. What do you think? Either one is fine, if it gets too large we will just convert it to a separately allocated piece of memory. > >Best regards, >Jozsef >- >E-mail : kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kadlecsik.jozsef@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt >Address : Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Hungarian Academy of >Sciences > H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html