Re: [nft] regarding sets names length

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 9. Oktober 2015 12:12:05 WESZ, schrieb Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>On Thu, 8 Oct 2015, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>> > > Agreed, I think its a good idea to use 32 as for the other object
>types.
>> > 
>> > I'd suggest 128 or even 256 chars. In ipset the set name is limited
>to 32 
>> > too but I had received a few complains and plan to increase it.
>> 
>> I guess we will follow suit then since we should be compatible to
>ipset
>> anyways. Did you already decide for a value?
>
>I thought 32 chars should be enough for everybody ;-) so I'm unsure
>about 
>the good enough value. 128 seems just pretty long, but the name length
>is 
>actually not critical, it could be 256. What do you think?

Either one is fine, if it gets too large we will just convert it to a separately allocated piece of memory.



>
>Best regards,
>Jozsef
>-
>E-mail  : kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kadlecsik.jozsef@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt
>Address : Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Hungarian Academy of
>Sciences
>          H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary


-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux