On Friday 2015-10-09 13:12, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote: >> >> I guess we will follow suit then since we should be compatible to ipset >> anyways. Did you already decide for a value? > >I thought 32 chars should be enough for everybody ;-) so I'm unsure about >the good enough value. 128 seems just pretty long, but the name length is >actually not critical, it could be 256. What do you think? 42. Is there a particular reason to stick to any particular length limit? Besides the Netlink packet limitations and page size restrictions, are there any "char x[STATICLIMIT]" fields that prohibit us from just offering practically-arbitrary-length strings (zero-terminated in C)? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
