On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 10:13:43PM -0600, Matthew Weber wrote: > Re-posting a link to a patch that was posted to lkml & linux-netdev at > first, then posted to netfilter-devel. > > http://marc.info/?t=134904906300003&r=1&w=1 > > It seems to have been rejected: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/188216/ > > We're building a custom C++ application which pulls in the iptables > header that requires this change. We wanted to see if we could get it > incorporated so we don't carry the patch as part of our build. I'm reticent to apply a kernel patch to resolve C++ compilation issues. You can easily fix this by keeping a cached copy of this header file in your userspace application. What existing C++ FOS software is using the native binary iptables interface? > I can gladly resubmit the patch but the one in patchworks is still > correct. I guess you're using an older kernel version, this nows resides in include/uapi/linux. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
