Sharat Masetty schreef op 1/05/2014 18:09:
We are using a 3.10.0 kernel version which has CONFIG_COMPAT enabled. The ebtables version is 2.0.10-4. This is arm 63/32 not x86. I also have another question. Do we need to compile the userspace tool using the sanitized kernel headers?(uapi/linux) or should we be using headers provided in the ebtables user space package? The reason for asking this question is that I see some differences in the structure definitions between the ebtables packaged kernel header files and the header files exposed by the kernel.
The kernel should be backwards compatible, so using the provided header files should be fine.
cheers, Bart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html