Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yes, but this looks like abuse of the flag semantics to me. > > Unless you mean that setting this feat flag should prompt the kernel > > to explicitly call a valiation function in case skb_csum_unnecessary() > > returns false? > > I mean exactly the current behaviour but forcing user-space to ask for > it. So skb info flag regarding checksumming comes from kernel if > explicitly requested from user-space. Fair enough, I can resubmit this for -next with this behaviour, I had hoped to avoid a new flag, since there is no reason for it OTHER than to figure out if the kernel knows about that checksumming feature. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
