Re: [PATCH] build: restore -version-info

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 1 Jul 2012, Jan Engelhardt wrote:

> On Sunday 2012-07-01 00:31, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> 
> >On Sun, 1 Jul 2012, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >
> >> On Sunday 2012-07-01 00:05, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> diff --git a/Make_global.am b/Make_global.am
> >> >> index 4a8f61a..446c4de 100644
> >> >> --- a/Make_global.am
> >> >> +++ b/Make_global.am
> >> >> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
> >> >>  # interface. 
> >> >>  
> >> >>  #            curr:rev:age
> >> >> -LIBVERSION = 3:0:1
> >> >> +LIBVERSION = 3:0:0
> >> >
> >> >The new library release is backward compatible with the previous one, so 
> >> >age must be incremented. That's why I set LIBVERSION to 3:0:1 from 2:1:0. 
> >> 
> >> Correct -- if you had stayed with "-version-info", which you did not.
> >
> >So if it's reverted back (second part of your patch), the the first part 
> >is to be skipped.
> 
> Since you already have made a release (ipset-6.13) emitting an .so.3
> file, I don't think you should go back to .so.2. Hence I am using 3:0:0.

What I meant is to keep LIBVERSION = 3:0:1, because that's right from 
backward compatibility view, and restore back -version-info.

Best regards,
Jozsef
-
E-mail  : kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kadlecsik.jozsef@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt
Address : Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences
          H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux