Re: iptables branch management

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 08.09.2011 16:41, schrieb Jan Engelhardt:
> 
> On Thursday 2011-09-08 14:52, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>>
>>> Nothing wrong, it just has not been done consistently or at all in the 
>>> past. I believe it does not hurt to go ahead with this, also since I am 
>>> statistically taking care of most submissions these days anyway.
>>
>> What has been done in the past doesn't really matter, we can of course
>> agree to have a stable branch when needed. But I don't see the point of
>> having a stable branch as long as it doesn't contain any fixes.
> 
> Oh we are nicely accumulating fixes & trivials already - do not worry 
> about that. Just let me pull this off, all it means is that
> there is another branch head on iptables.git, and something convenient 
> for the release manager to tag should the need arise for a .y release. 
> Users already seem to like the idea[1].
> [1] http://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=131499886708085&w=2
> 

Sure, go ahead.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux