Re: iptables branch management

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 2011-09-08 12:05, Patrick McHardy wrote:

>Am 05.09.2011 19:54, schrieb Pablo Neira Ayuso:
>> Hi Jan,
>> 
>> On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 04:20:13PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>> Hei
>>>
>>> I would like to propose a "stable" branch that would be rooted 
>>> in the most recent tag and only receive fixes. Furtheremore, 
>>> the branch is merged time and again into master, so that the 
>>> fix is available in both without cherry-pick. 1.4.12.x releases be made 
>>> from stable, and 1.4.y from master.
>>> How about it?
>> 
>> Hm, I remember that we had this discussion before.
>> 
>> I think it's probably too much overhead for it, looking at how other
>> similar net-tools are maintained, the amount of contributions that
>> er receive and amount of changes that get into every version.
>
>I also think this is probably overkill, what's wrong with simply
>creating stable branches on demand if there are important fixes
>that require a new release?

Nothing wrong, it just has not been done consistently or at all in the 
past. I believe it does not hurt to go ahead with this, also since I am 
statistically taking care of most submissions these days anyway.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux