On Thursday 2011-09-08 14:52, Patrick McHardy wrote: >> >> Nothing wrong, it just has not been done consistently or at all in the >> past. I believe it does not hurt to go ahead with this, also since I am >> statistically taking care of most submissions these days anyway. > >What has been done in the past doesn't really matter, we can of course >agree to have a stable branch when needed. But I don't see the point of >having a stable branch as long as it doesn't contain any fixes. Oh we are nicely accumulating fixes & trivials already - do not worry about that. Just let me pull this off, all it means is that there is another branch head on iptables.git, and something convenient for the release manager to tag should the need arise for a .y release. Users already seem to like the idea[1]. [1] http://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=131499886708085&w=2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
