On Friday 2011-07-15 01:17, David Miller wrote: >From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx> >Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 01:15:47 +0200 (CEST) > >> Of course yours is feature-richer. But the topic of IPv6 NAT has had >> come up a number of unrecollectable times, and the response has been the >> same everytime - NAT is still an ugly undesired hack whose recurrence >> wants to be avoided. > >People want to hide the details of the topology of their >internal networks, And IPv6 Privacy w.r.t. random address selection, combined with a firewall, won't do that? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
