On Tuesday 2011-01-18 21:37, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote: >> >> >> >> this does not work for AF_INET6: >> >> >> >> ipset add foo6 20a1:1:2:3:4:5:6:7/128 >> >> ipset v5.2: Syntax error: plain IP address must be supplied: 20a1:1:2:3:4:5:6:7/128 >> > >> >Yeah, the usual issue: should IPv4/32 and IPv6/128 be handled as a plain >> >IPv4/v6 address when the manual says "enter a plain IPv4/v6 address" :-). >> >> (Assuming this was a question, heuristically based on the word order >> you used:) I don't think so. iptables, resp. its modules, do not >> allow that either. > >I know, but the situation is a little bit more complicated: the set type >in question works differently with IPv4 and IPv6. In the IPv4 case, a >range of IP addresses as IPv4/prefix is accepted as input (thus >192.168.1.1/32 too), while for IPv6, only plain IPv6 addresses are allowed >and therefore 20a1:1:2:3:4:5:6:7/128 was rejected. Is there a specific reason that there is no IPv6 net support? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
