Re: [patch 2/4] ipset: make IPv4 and IPv6 address handling similar

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 2011-01-18 21:18, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
>On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, holger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> While the following works for AF_INET:
>> 
>>  ipset add foo 192.168.1.1/32
>> 
>> this does not work for AF_INET6:
>> 
>>  ipset add foo6 20a1:1:2:3:4:5:6:7/128
>>  ipset v5.2: Syntax error: plain IP address must be supplied: 20a1:1:2:3:4:5:6:7/128
>
>Yeah, the usual issue: should IPv4/32 and IPv6/128 be handled as a plain 
>IPv4/v6 address when the manual says "enter a plain IPv4/v6 address" :-).

(Assuming this was a question, heuristically based on the word order
you used:) I don't think so. iptables, resp. its modules, do not
allow that either.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux