On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Tuesday 2011-01-18 21:18, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote: > >On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, holger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > >> While the following works for AF_INET: > >> > >> ipset add foo 192.168.1.1/32 > >> > >> this does not work for AF_INET6: > >> > >> ipset add foo6 20a1:1:2:3:4:5:6:7/128 > >> ipset v5.2: Syntax error: plain IP address must be supplied: 20a1:1:2:3:4:5:6:7/128 > > > >Yeah, the usual issue: should IPv4/32 and IPv6/128 be handled as a plain > >IPv4/v6 address when the manual says "enter a plain IPv4/v6 address" :-). > > (Assuming this was a question, heuristically based on the word order > you used:) I don't think so. iptables, resp. its modules, do not > allow that either. I know, but the situation is a little bit more complicated: the set type in question works differently with IPv4 and IPv6. In the IPv4 case, a range of IP addresses as IPv4/prefix is accepted as input (thus 192.168.1.1/32 too), while for IPv6, only plain IPv6 addresses are allowed and therefore 20a1:1:2:3:4:5:6:7/128 was rejected. That looks really odd so I added the feature (but could not resist to add my comment as a pseudo-question :-). Best regards, Jozsef - E-mail : kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxx PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt Address : KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
