H. Peter Anvin a écrit : > > Uhm... no. The reason we'll see dynamic prefixes isn't because of lack > of address space but because of mandatory route aggregation (which *is* > being implemented from the start) -- to keep BGP6 and the core routing > tables from melting down. Sorry to be a bit off-topic, but could you (or anyone) please explain the relationship between dynamic prefixes and route aggregation ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
