Re: [PATCH 11/11] netfilter: xtables: convert basic nfproto match functions into xt matches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 2010-05-11 15:45, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> 
>> The plan, as posted last fall[1], is to continue generalizing the 
>> different iptables copies into one, bringing Xtables up to the next 
>> level, e.g. family-agnostic rulesets, while retaining 
>> compatibility.
>> 
>> [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/345176/
>> 
>> The "when" originally was 2.6.32, but I got a little slacky in doing 
>> requested benchmarks, so it had practically postponed itself to the 
>> current cycle, 2.6.35. If my counting is right, ~41 patches of that 
>> list[1] have been merged, and while doing that, 46 concurrent 
>> commits/ideas of mine have also been merged.
>> 
>> There are at least 60 patches left however, and that does not include 
>> any comments from your side. I guess I don't get to spool and flush the 
>> entire queue to 2.6.35 anymore - "better luck next time", or?
>
>Well, I have no problems already merging parts that make sense on
>their own, but this patchset kind of stops in the middle.

I felt it made more sense to cut at 11 rather than 8. The next
coherent batch would start introducing pure new code and would
already be one of size 29. I mean I don't mind, you will look
through them either way ;-)

>My suggestions would be for me to merge patches 01-08 and you
>include the remaining ones in a series that actually need that
>change. If you manage to submit that series in time for 2.6.35,
>even better. How does that sound?

Always fine by me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux