Thomas Jacob wrote: > On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 14:12 +0200, Thomas Jacob wrote: >> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 07:24:58PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: >>> Thomas Jacob wrote: >>>> Bug? Feature? If it's the latter, how can I prevent this from >>>> happening? >>> Does this patch helps? It seems that we're missing to add the size of >>> the hardware address since 2.6.27. >> Thanks for the quick reply and the patch. Unfortunately I haven't found a way >> to reproduce this problem in a lab environment yet, so I can't confirm >> whether or not it does anything. Originally the issue >> occurred when hot-replacing an older system with one that >> runs NFLOG/ulogd2 and the versions listed, thereby generating lots >> of invalid packets probably (which should have been logged) as well >> as some intentional drops (Packet rate at the time maybe was 30kpps). > > Just to let you know, I still haven't been able to reproduce the > problem in the lab, but the errors went away in the production > environment after applying your patch, so presumably it did the trick. > Also, the lines in question are clearly missing anyway. Thanks for the info. I think that it should be related with the patch. I'll try make some tests by hot-replacing the daemon in my testbed to see if I catch anything. -- "Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
