On Sunday 2008-10-05 11:12, Patrick McHardy wrote: >> > >> Ok just let me rebase all the stuff, and I'll send you something >> that goes on top of 8d51a66159a6fbc27342ee80e5b69910a679735e . > > Thanks. As an added explanation - the benchmarking I did for nftables > indicated that we're somewhere between 50 and 110 cycles for a "usual" > rule on my x2. So its really easy to degrade performance significantly > by just requiring a few more cycles. The upside is that it works in both > directions :) Can I at least make it a single patch (i.e. on top of the batch of 6 that do the minimal transformation) or does it need to be right from the start? (at the expensive of enlarging the patch and setting up the reviewer ;-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
