Re: iptables performance and alternatives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 2008-05-15 13:18, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, 15 May 2008, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thursday 2008-05-15 11:34, Eric Leblond wrote:
>> >
>> > One other thing to look at may be :
>> > http://www.netfilter.org/projects/patch-o-matic/pom-external.html#pom-external-IPMARK
>>
>> That variant is as old as POM and broken.
>
> The second statement is not true as it shoudl work with all 2.6.x kernels and
> both iptables-1.3 and iptables-1.4.

It will definitely not work for 32-bit userland+64-bit kernel due to a size
mismatch. But since it is fixed in Xtables-addons, no further action is needed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux