Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Tuesday 2008-04-08 18:14, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Small suggestion for improvement (don't worry, your series
is fine :)): the best ordering for all these patches would
have been:
Set 1: boolean conversions
Set 2: length match (shouldn't have dependencies)
Set 3: recent match (also shouldn't have dependencies)
Set 4: prefix table
Set 5: TCPMSS target
Set 6: ARP-tables patches
You would not believe it, but it was set-ordered.
YMMV what makes up a set, though.
[...]
Invent house numbering?
[patch 12/xx] xt_length
[patch 12a/xx] xt_length userspace
[patch 13/xx] xt_foobar (kernel only thing)
[patch 14/xx] xt_bazzzz
[patch 14a/xx] ..
don't think git likes that :p
:)
Just sending them seperately makes the barriers explicit,
so that makes most sense IMO.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
