Re: xt_owner-xt_socket plans

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On January 21 2008 10:11, Laszlo Attila Toth wrote:
>Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> I just remembered that xt_socket (from tproxy) does an (explicit) socket
>> lookup. xt_owner on the other hand, takes the socket pointer from the skb --
>> which of course only works in the output path.
>> 
>> xt_owner is still in the 2.6.25 development queue, and because the two
>> modules are similar, I thought that maybe xt_owner could be merged with
>> xt_socket (doing a rename to xt_socket in the current net-2.6.25),
>> because they are quite close in their task.
>> 
>> That would also allow xt_owner to be used in the input path.
>> 
>> Opinions?
>
> Hello,
>
> That sounds great.
>
> Note that the socket match depends on tproxy core, also the tproxy would be
> partially merged into the net-2.25 tree. [...]

Here is what I had in mind, please have a look.
http://dev.computergmbh.de/gitweb.cgi?p=linux;h=dev-xtsocket;a=shortlog
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux