On Nov 7 2007 20:50, Peter Warasin wrote: >Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> On Nov 7 2007 20:11, Peter Warasin wrote: >>> If you want me to change it to --dry-run, i will do that, so i can use >>> -t for --table. >> >> be prepared to hear the 'that breaks compatibilty' argument. >> Though, since it's 1.4.0, I'd go for it :p > >I imagine :) >Ok, i will try. > >BTW: Is somewhere some sort of coding style documentation which i can >read in order to prevent such mistakes, or is it just the linux kernel >coding style? LKCS is the preferred one, yes. >Some of the malformed style you suggested to change are due to >copy&paste of current iptables code, which i used as reference in some >cases, so i am little confused now. Yup, there is a lot of crufty code. Like what, less than 1% of all active developers of a project care about styling. Unfortunately for netfilter, 1% of N is generally less than 1. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
