Hi Jan
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Nov 7 2007 19:15, Peter Warasin wrote:
>>> Is a dry-run option really needed? iptables-edit does not commit
>> Attention, this is a new option of iptables-restore, not of iptables-edit.
> -t means table for:
[..]
> iptables-restore having -t for test really seems out of place.
i agree.
> That said, iptables-restore does not have a -t, according to its help text
> ("iptables-restore -h") and its manpage.
Thats not true. The current subversion code uses -t for --test. Probably
you confuse with iptables-save ?
http://svn.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/iptables/iptables-restore.c?rev=7087&view=markup
-------- snip -----------------------------------------------
case 't':
testing = 1;
break;
-------- snap -----------------------------------------------
If you want me to change it to --dry-run, i will do that, so i can use
-t for --table.
peter
--
:: e n d i a n
:: open source - open minds
:: peter warasin
:: http://www.endian.com :: peter@xxxxxxxxxx
begin:vcard
fn:Peter Warasin
n:;Peter Warasin
org:Endian GmbH/Srl
adr:;;Pillhof 47;Frangart/Frangarto;BZ;I-39010;Italien/Italia
email;internet:peter@xxxxxxxxxx
tel;work:+39 0471 631763
tel;fax:+39 0471 631764
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.endian.com
version:2.1
end:vcard
