On Nov 7 2007 19:15, Peter Warasin wrote:
>
>> Is a dry-run option really needed? iptables-edit does not commit
>
>Attention, this is a new option of iptables-restore, not of iptables-edit.
>--test was already implemented within iptables-restore.
>So in order to use -t instead of -T it's necessary to rename --test to
>for example --dry-run
-t means table for:
iptables
iptables-save
ip6tables
ip6tables-save
arptables
ebtables
iptables-restore having -t for test really seems out of place.
That said, iptables-restore does not have a -t, according to its help text
("iptables-restore -h") and its manpage.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
