Re: [PATCH v8 5/6] trace_uprobe/sdt: Prevent multiple reference counter for same uprobe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2018-08-13 13:49:44]:

> Hi Song,
> 
> On 08/11/2018 01:42 PM, Song Liu wrote:
> > Do we really need this given we already have PATCH 4/6?
> > uprobe_regsiter() can be called
> > out of trace_uprobe, this patch won't catch all conflicts anyway.
> 
> Right but it, at least, catch all conflicts happening via trace_uprobe.
> 
> I don't mind in removing this patch but I would like to get an opinion of
> Oleg/Srikar/Steven/Masami.
> 

I would suggest to keep it, atleast it can ctah conflicts happening via
trace_uprobe.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux