On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 04:55:26PM +0100, James Hogan wrote: > Hi Sergei, > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 06:42:08PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > > On 03/30/2017 06:06 PM, James Hogan wrote: > > > @@ -254,25 +251,46 @@ void sleeping_thread_to_gdb_regs(unsigned long *gdb_regs, struct task_struct *p) > > > #endif > > > > > > for (reg = 0; reg < 16; reg++) > > > - *(ptr++) = regs->regs[reg]; > > > + *(ptr++) = 0; > > > > Parens are not really necessary, you can get rid of them, while at it. > > While not technically required, I disagree that we should get rid of > them, simply because after coding in C for almost 20 years I still had > to look at an operator precedence table to check which of post++ and > dereference operators take precedence. I strongly side with James on this one so I applied the patch as-is. Ralf
