On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:22:16AM +0000, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Thu, 15 Dec 2016, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > Fix build with binutils 2.25 by open coding the offending > > > > dli $1, 0x9000000080000000 > > > > as > > > > li $1, 0x9000 > > dsll $1, $1, 48 > > > > which is ugly be the only thing that will build on all binutils vintages. > > What about bit #31? Shouldn't this be say: > > lui $1, 0x9000 > dsll $1, $1, 16 > ori $1, $1, 0x8000 > dsll $1, $1, 16 > > ? Argh, didn't spot the `8' in there. 64 bit constants are way too long :) Thanks for reporting, will fix. Ralf
