On Thu, 15 Dec 2016, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Fix build with binutils 2.25 by open coding the offending > > dli $1, 0x9000000080000000 > > as > > li $1, 0x9000 > dsll $1, $1, 48 > > which is ugly be the only thing that will build on all binutils vintages. What about bit #31? Shouldn't this be say: lui $1, 0x9000 dsll $1, $1, 16 ori $1, $1, 0x8000 dsll $1, $1, 16 ? Maciej
