On 10/07/2014 12:09 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
I agree completely here. We should not break things (or, as it seems, leave them broken) for common usage cases that affect everyone just to coddle proprietary vendor-specific instructions. The latter just should not be used in delay slots unless the chip vendor also promises to provide fpu branch in hardware. RichAnd what do you propose - remove a current in-stack emulation and you still think it doesn't break a status-quo?
