On 09/12/2013 10:50 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Are there any reasons why you cannot quote an internal note about this
errata which would give a better idea of what this code is about?
Sorry but the diff really does not help understand what is happening
without a proper explanation of why this is required. At first glance
it would like some revisions of the CPU are affected by some D$ bug?
Okaaay. How about we just stop here. I posted a poor quality patch that
did not have enough information. I will post a second version that will
have the details of what E16 is and what is being fixed. This will
involve me talking to hardware engineers to get something I can put in
the patch. My sincere apologies to everyone. I will go crawl back under
my rock and finish my work for this week. You should see the corrected
version the first part of next week. Cheers.
Steve
