On Sat, 7 Apr 2012, Steven J. Hill wrote: > diff --git a/arch/mips/mm/uasm.c b/arch/mips/mm/uasm.c > index 5fa1851..fb6d8e27 100644 > --- a/arch/mips/mm/uasm.c > +++ b/arch/mips/mm/uasm.c > @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ enum opcode { > insn_bne, insn_cache, insn_daddu, insn_daddiu, insn_dmfc0, > insn_dmtc0, insn_dsll, insn_dsll32, insn_dsra, insn_dsrl, > insn_dsrl32, insn_drotr, insn_drotr32, insn_dsubu, insn_eret, > + insn_ins, insn_ext, > insn_j, insn_jal, insn_jr, insn_ld, insn_ll, insn_lld, > insn_lui, insn_lw, insn_mfc0, insn_mtc0, insn_or, insn_ori, > insn_pref, insn_rfe, insn_sc, insn_scd, insn_sd, insn_sll, > @@ -113,6 +114,8 @@ static struct insn insn_table[] __uasminitdata = { > { insn_drotr32, M(spec_op, 1, 0, 0, 0, dsrl32_op), RT | RD | RE }, > { insn_dsubu, M(spec_op, 0, 0, 0, 0, dsubu_op), RS | RT | RD }, > { insn_eret, M(cop0_op, cop_op, 0, 0, 0, eret_op), 0 }, > + { insn_ins, M(spec3_op, 0, 0, 0, 0, ins_op), RS | RT | RD | RE }, > + { insn_ext, M(spec3_op, 0, 0, 0, 0, ext_op), RS | RT | RD | RE }, > { insn_j, M(j_op, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0), JIMM }, > { insn_jal, M(jal_op, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0), JIMM }, > { insn_jr, M(spec_op, 0, 0, 0, 0, jr_op), RS }, Not an extensive review -- just noticed this issue while browsing... These two data definitions are clearly alphabetically ordered, so please keep them as such. It seems rather a trivial update in this case -- just swap the new entries. Thanks. Maciej