On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 04:43:16PM +0200, Manuel Lauss wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Mark Brown
> >> + case (~DMA_D0 & ~DMA_D1):
> >> + pr_debug("DMA %d empty irq.\n", stream->dma);
> > This case should return IRQ_NONE really since it didn't handle an
> > interrupt...
> If that last case ever happens the DMA engine is broken, as it shouldn't
> issue interrupts when no transfer is in progress. The errata sheets don't
> mention anything (yet).
In that case this should be an error rather than debug level print and
I'd say the IRQ_NONE thing definitely applies.
