Hello.
David Daney wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tomaso Paoletti <tpaoletti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <Paul.Gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/smp.h
index 0ff5b52..e6f419f 100644
--- a/arch/mips/include/asm/smp.h
+++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/smp.h
@@ -37,6 +37,9 @@ extern int __cpu_logical_map[NR_CPUS];
#define SMP_RESCHEDULE_YOURSELF 0x1 /* XXX braindead */
#define SMP_CALL_FUNCTION 0x2
+/* Octeon - Tell another core to flush its icache */
+#define SMP_ICACHE_FLUSH 0x4
+
Sigh, again new macro without users...
The users are in 01/29 and 04/29, perhaps you missed them.
Using before defining? Cool. :-]
We are currently touching 82 files. I think the patch set is bisectable
for non-octeon targets.
If you would like me to move the Kconfig patch to the end, I can do
that. That way you wouldn't have any breakage for octeon if you were to
only apply a subset of the patches. Other than that, there are
currently no plans to restructure this patch set to try to maintain
rigorous define before use ordering.
Maybe it's just me, but IMHO first using the macro and then, 15 patches
after that, having a patch that just adds that macro, is going against the
common sense...
David Daney
WBR, Sergei
