Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello.
David Daney wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tomaso Paoletti <tpaoletti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <Paul.Gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/mips/include/asm/smp.h | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/smp.h
index 0ff5b52..e6f419f 100644
--- a/arch/mips/include/asm/smp.h
+++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/smp.h
@@ -37,6 +37,9 @@ extern int __cpu_logical_map[NR_CPUS];
#define SMP_RESCHEDULE_YOURSELF 0x1 /* XXX braindead */
#define SMP_CALL_FUNCTION 0x2
+/* Octeon - Tell another core to flush its icache */
+#define SMP_ICACHE_FLUSH 0x4
+
Sigh, again new macro without users...
The users are in 01/29 and 04/29, perhaps you missed them.
Using before defining? Cool. :-]
We are currently touching 82 files. I think the patch set is bisectable
for non-octeon targets.
If you would like me to move the Kconfig patch to the end, I can do
that. That way you wouldn't have any breakage for octeon if you were to
only apply a subset of the patches. Other than that, there are
currently no plans to restructure this patch set to try to maintain
rigorous define before use ordering.
David Daney
