Re: [PATCH 1/2] ide: Add tx4939ide driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 17:44:59 +0100, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > command/status registers, but the register layout is swapped on big
> > endian.  There are some other endian issue and some special registers
> > which requires many custom dma_ops/port_ops routines.
> 
> It would probably be a lot cleaner using the libata framework, and also
> go obsolete less soon.

Yes, that's future plan.

> > +#define TX4939IDE_writeb(val, base, reg) \
> > +	__raw_writeb(val, (void __iomem *)((base) + TX4939IDE_REG8(reg)))
> 
> It's generally frowned upon to hide all the detail in macros, it is much
> easier to read and understand the code if you don't do this.

OK, I'll try to make much readble.

> > +#define TX4939IDE_BASE(hwif)	((hwif)->io_ports.data_addr & ~0xfff)
> 
> Why do you have void __iomem casts all over the write methods not in the
> _BASE() method - that would let sparse do its job properly

Indeed. I'll do it.

> > +	for (i = 0; i < MAX_DRIVES; i++) {
> > +		if (drive != &hwif->drives[i] &&
> 
> You don't actually need the first test. This also appears wrong. In your
> tests MW_DMA_0 is 'faster' than PIO4 but in fact MW_DMA_0 PIO timings are
> *slower* than PIO4 so the mode is not in fact slower.
> 
> > +	case XFER_MW_DMA_2:
> > +	case XFER_MW_DMA_1:
> > +	case XFER_MW_DMA_0:
> > +	case XFER_PIO_4:
> > +		value |= 0x0400;
> > +		break;
> 
> This looks odd according to the speed tables. Can you clarify what is
> going on ?

As you and Sergei pointed out, the code seems somewhat broken.  I'll
rework on it.

> > +#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
> > +	{
> > +		unsigned int *table = hwif->dmatable_cpu;
> > +		while (1) {
> > +			cpu_to_le64s((u64 *)table);
> > +			if (*table & 0x80000000)
> > +				break;
> 
> You modify the table but you never ensure the data is not still in
> temporary variables from the compiler or flushed from cache

The dmatable_cpu is allocated by pci_alloc_consistent so that flush is
not needed.  But... this is not PCI device.  I should not use
ide_allocate_dma_engine().  I'll fix it.

Thank you for review.
---
Atsushi Nemoto


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux