On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Franck Bui-Huu wrote: > > Hmm, isn't what `info ld' says enough? > > Hmm, I'm must be blind but I missed that each time I read it. Could > you point out the section number please ? That's section 3.8, I would guess, but if what you are looking for is not there, then perhaps the description could be improved. Maciej
