On Sep 29, 2006, at 8:29 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:58:02AM +0900, girish wrote:Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:58:02 +0900 Subject: PATCH] cleanup hardcoding __pa/__va macros etc. (take-4) From: girish <girishvg@xxxxxxxxx> To: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> CC: "linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, girish <girishvg@xxxxxxxxx> Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="B_3242253489_7379959"Using just plain text and adding Signed-off-by line would be preferred. Also your patch seems against neither latest lmo nor kernel.org tree...The kernel sources I was referring to were 2.6.17-rc6.In the meantime, I couldn't find the changes suggested for SPARSEMEM support in the main source tree. Especially the ones reviewed during month of August ([PATCH] do not count pages in holes with sparsemem ...). Could you pleaseresend the consolidated patch to the list? Thanks.August? I sent the patch with that title in July and applied already.http://www.linux-mips.org/git?p=linux.git;a=commit;h=239367b4Again, I was referring to older sources, that is 2.6.17-rc6. I have just upgraded reference sources to 2.6.18 as mentioned above & now I see thechanges. Thanks. In fact I am experimenting on highmem/sparsemem with 2.6.16.16 kernel sources.Please find attached patch created from 2.6.18 (kernel.org) tree. Let meknow if this is alright. Signed-off-by: Girish V. Gulawani <girishvg@xxxxxxxxx>-#ifdef CONFIG_ISA - if (low < max_dma) + if (low < max_dma) } This doesn't quite compile.
Stupid mistake. Fixed & resending. Signed-off-by: Girish V. Gulawani <girishvg@xxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
patch-pavafix-20060929
Description: Binary data
