On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:58:02AM +0900, girish wrote: > Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:58:02 +0900 > Subject: PATCH] cleanup hardcoding __pa/__va macros etc. (take-4) > From: girish <girishvg@xxxxxxxxx> > To: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > CC: "linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, > girish <girishvg@xxxxxxxxx> > Content-type: multipart/mixed; > boundary="B_3242253489_7379959" > > > > Using just plain text and adding Signed-off-by line would be preferred. > > Also your patch seems against neither latest lmo nor kernel.org tree... > > The kernel sources I was referring to were 2.6.17-rc6. > > > >> In the meantime, I couldn't find the changes suggested for SPARSEMEM support > >> in the main source tree. Especially the ones reviewed during month of August > >> ([PATCH] do not count pages in holes with sparsemem ...). Could you please > >> resend the consolidated patch to the list? Thanks. > > > > August? I sent the patch with that title in July and applied already. > > > > http://www.linux-mips.org/git?p=linux.git;a=commit;h=239367b4 > > Again, I was referring to older sources, that is 2.6.17-rc6. I have just > upgraded reference sources to 2.6.18 as mentioned above & now I see the > changes. Thanks. In fact I am experimenting on highmem/sparsemem with > 2.6.16.16 kernel sources. > > > Please find attached patch created from 2.6.18 (kernel.org) tree. Let me > know if this is alright. > > Signed-off-by: Girish V. Gulawani <girishvg@xxxxxxxxx> -#ifdef CONFIG_ISA - if (low < max_dma) + if (low < max_dma) } This doesn't quite compile. Ralf
