> Using just plain text and adding Signed-off-by line would be preferred. > Also your patch seems against neither latest lmo nor kernel.org tree... The kernel sources I was referring to were 2.6.17-rc6. >> In the meantime, I couldn't find the changes suggested for SPARSEMEM support >> in the main source tree. Especially the ones reviewed during month of August >> ([PATCH] do not count pages in holes with sparsemem ...). Could you please >> resend the consolidated patch to the list? Thanks. > > August? I sent the patch with that title in July and applied already. > > http://www.linux-mips.org/git?p=linux.git;a=commit;h=239367b4 Again, I was referring to older sources, that is 2.6.17-rc6. I have just upgraded reference sources to 2.6.18 as mentioned above & now I see the changes. Thanks. In fact I am experimenting on highmem/sparsemem with 2.6.16.16 kernel sources. Please find attached patch created from 2.6.18 (kernel.org) tree. Let me know if this is alright. Signed-off-by: Girish V. Gulawani <girishvg@xxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
patch-pavafix-20060928
Description: Binary data
